You can write to the hospital administration here to complain at this
outrageous, Soviet-style treatment of Professor Fourtillan:
direction.careiron@ch-uzes.fr <mailto:direction.careiron@ch-uzes.fr>
Accomplished pharma prof thrown in psych hospital after questioning
official COVID narrative
www.lifesitenews.com/news/accomplished-pharma-prof-thrown-in-psych-hospital-after-questioning-official-covid-narrative
<www.lifesitenews.com/news/accomplished-pharma-prof-thrown-in-psych-hospital-after-questioning-official-covid-narrative>
Early on December 10, Jean-Bernard Fourtillan was taken from his home by
a team of French law enforcement officers under military command and
forcibly placed in solitary confinement at the psychiatric hospital of Uzès.
Fri Dec 11, 2020 – 7:35 pm EST
Screen Shot 2020-12-12 at 21.05.41.png
Uzès, home of the psychiatric hospital where Jean-Bernard Fourtillan is
being held against his will. Begir / Shutterstock.com
By Jeanne Smits, Paris correspondent
December 11, 2020 (LifeSiteNews <www.lifesitenews.com/>) — Early
on December 10, Jean-Bernard Fourtillan, a French retired university
professor known for his strong opposition to COVID-19 vaccines such as
those presently being distributed in the U.K., was taken from his
temporary home in the south of France by a team of “gendarmes” — French
law enforcement officers under military command — and forcibly placed in
solitary confinement at the psychiatric hospital of Uzès. His mobile
phones were taken from him, and at the time of writing, he had not been
allowed to communicate with the outside world.
The systematic use of psychiatric hospitals in order to silence or
punish political opponents became widespread under communism, having
started shortly after the Bolshevik revolution in Russia in 1917. The
method developed under Stalin and then expanded as opposition to the
“socialist paradise” came to be considered a sign of mental illness.
Under the 1966 penal code of the USSR, repression of dissidents openly
targeted those who “spread false propaganda defaming the Soviet State
and its social system.”
Fourtillan, a longtime critic of vaccines that use dangerous adjuvants
such as aluminum (the 11 compulsory vaccines for newborns contain 17
times the maximum dose of aluminum defined as toxic by the World Health
Organization), has been vocal during the COVID-19 crisis. He offers
“alternative” explanations and warnings regarding the apparition of the
SARS-COV-2 virus and the ARN vaccines that work by injecting pieces of
virus message ARN with nanolipids with the aim of causing human cells to
start fabricating viral particles and to thus trigger an immunological
reaction.
In particular, Fourtillan has accused the French Institut Pasteur, a
private non-profit foundation that specializes in biology,
micro-organisms, contagious diseases, and vaccination, of having
“fabricated” the SARS-COV-2 virus over several decades and been a party
to its “escape” from the Wuhan P4 lab — unbeknownst to the lab’s Chinese
authorities — which was built following an agreement between France and
China signed in 2004.
Relations between France and China regarding the project cooled over the
years as China put its own interests first, but in 2017, France’s
then–Interior minister, Bernard Cazeneuve, joined the official opening
ceremony of the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s P4 lab, together with Yves
Lévy, co-president of the steering committee. Lévy is the husband of
Agnès Buzyn, who was France’s health minister when the COVID-19 crisis
erupted. She was also responsible for signing the decree that banned
over-the-counter sales of hydroxychloroquine in France in January 2020.
Is Jean-Bernard Fourtillan’s accusation true? While the Institut Pasteur
has verbally announced that it would sue Fourtillan over the accusation,
no judiciary action has been forthcoming on that front, and indeed,
Fourtillan himself has since lodged a complaint against a spokesman of
the Institute for “libel and lies that are prejudicial to the peoples of
the world.”
Fourtillan himself has said he hopes legal proceedings will allow him to
produce evidence he has built up: he is in fact anxious to debate the
issues at stake. Now that he is in a psychiatric hospital, the
possibility of this happening — in the interest of discovering the truth
— is becoming more remote.
Among the public documents Fourtillan has analyzed and made public are
patents for SARS-COV-1, which contains parts of the malaria virus,
dating back to 2003. The patents were used by various labs to develop
vaccines. Two thousand eleven saw the Institut Pasteur filing a further
patent application for “SARS-COV-2,” which was identical to the previous
one, according to Fourtillan, who says this was done because commercial
exploitation of the first patent started in 2003 and would expire 20
years later, in 2023. According to Fourtillan, four sequences of the HIV
virus — responsible for AIDS — were added to the virus, in view of
creating further vaccines.
This point was also raised in France last April by Prof. Luc Montagnier,
who won the 2008 Nobel Prize for medicine for having discovered HIV in
1983 together with another French scientist, Françoise Barré-Sinoussi.
Last April, Montagnier stated that the SARS-COV-2 virus was the result
of a human manipulation. He was ridiculed by the mainstream media, but
in August, an Italian microbiologist reached the same conclusion: Prof.
Joseph Tritto published a book calling the Wuhan virus a “chimera.”
Montagnier, who had worked with a mathematician, described his findings
through an analogy
<www.francesoir.fr/societe-sante/covid-19-lorigine-du-virus-lanalyse-du-pr-tritto-confirme-celle-du-pr-montagnier>.
Imagine the coronavirus as a “puzzle” with 30,000 pieces, and then
consider several other 9,000-piece puzzles representing HIV-1, HIV-2,
and SIV (another retrovirus close to the AIDS virus but targeting
monkeys). If three pieces coming from each one of these smaller puzzles
were to be found next to each other in the 30,000-piece puzzle, the
probability of this having happened naturally would be nil. This is
analogous to the presence of parts of the HIV sequence in SARS-COV-2,
according to Montagnier.
According to Fourtillan, the present virus causing COVID-19 is this
artificial virus. Fourtillan — as well as other researchers of the
present crisis — considers this indisputable evidence that the COVID-19
pandemic was planned. He believes that on October 13, 2015, a patent
application was filed for a COVID-19 test; this was followed by
commercialization in the whole world in 2017 for a whopping 10 billion
dollars.
These claims are disputed
<english.rvo.nl/news/covid-19-mentioned-2015-patent-application>on
the grounds that the reference to the 2015 patent is only part of the
later May 2020 patent, also filed by one Richard A. Rothschild, but was
quoted as related to the remote diagnosis of COVID-19, enhancing the
original patent as it were for the particular case of COVID-19.
Who is right? A sincere, public assessment and debate would lift any
confusion or error, voluntary or not, but Fourtillan is now being
treated as if he were both dangerous and insane.
Fourtillan gained widespread publicity when a recent film by Pierre
Barnérias, giving a voice to critics of the official narrative, became
viral in France. In /Hold-Up/, Fourtillan
his concern that the COVID-19 crisis was fabricated and is being used to
impose a dangerous vaccine on the world population.
Fourtillan is himself familiar with patenting procedures, as his résumé
shows <www.valentonine.fr/images/piece02bis_CV_JBF.pdf>, having
personally filed some 400 patents in the medical field. The French
internet medium /France Soir /described him as follows: “Jean-Bernard
FOURTILLAN, Ph.D., Chemical Engineer, Pharmacist, Hospital Pharmacist,
Professor of Therapeutic Chemistry and Pharmacokinetics at the Faculty
of Medicine and Pharmacology of the University of Poitiers, Expert
Pharmacologist Toxicologist, specialized in Pharmacokinetics.”
Fourtillan’s forced internment made no mention of the COVID-19
controversy, which to date has led to no judicial proceedings, instead
being officially linked to a lawsuit that has been opened against him
for illegal practice of medicine because of his work on a hormonal patch
against neuro-degenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease,
Alzheimer’s, and others affecting motricity, balance, and memory, as
well as sleep disorders.
His theory is that pollution, adjuvants such as aluminum in vaccines,
and electro-magnetic interference destroy dark matter in the brain
through lack of hormones, and he has — successfully, he claims — tested
the administration of a hormone patch of valentonin and
6-Méthoxy-Harmalan (sleep and waking hormones), to compensate the
damage, on 402 adults, himself included, who accepted the procedure
under their sole responsibility and who were warned that the patch was
not a drug, but a “technical sample, not for human use.” The procedure
costs only a fraction of the price of newly developed drugs for these
conditions.
Fourtillan had had a good rapport with the judge charged with the
preliminary investigation of the case, Brigitte Jolivet of Poitiers.
During his first interrogations at the end of 2019, she appeared to be
convinced by his arguments, and the case was proceeding normally.
Last month, Fourtillan, who was staying in the south of France with his
wife, was visited by four gendarmes coming from Marseille, who entered
his rented cottage and asked for his computers. Although they had no
search warrant, Fourtillan handed them over, saying he had nothing to
hide, and that on the contrary, he was anxious to have his documents and
methods assessed.
He saw the gendarmes leave and hand over his computers to a man in plain
clothes in a car nearby.
Days later, his bank accounts and credit cards were suddenly blocked by
an authority whose identity was not revealed to him. His pensions were
also blocked.
Fourtillan had been summoned to a hearing in the lawsuit concerning his
valentonin “treatment” on December 4 in Paris. He did not go, invoking
the fact that he now had no way of paying for a train ticket to the
French capital.
This information was given to LifeSite by a person who works with
Fourtillan on the website verite-covid19.com/
<verite-covid19.com/>and who knows him well — well enough to
state that he “is certainly not insane,” having spent time with him
recently.
Six days later, on Thursday morning, gendarmes once more came to
Fourtillan’s home and asked him to accompany them in order to answer
questions about his refusal to join the December 4 hearing in Paris.
Fourtillan agreed readily.
However, from the moment he left his home with the law enforcement
officers, he was not able to communicate with his family. One of his
lawyers, Marc Fribourg — who has since gone on record saying that
Fourtillan is a “conspiracy theorist” — revealed that he was taken to
the Uzès psychiatric hospital of Le Mas Careiron
<etablissements.fhf.fr/annuaire/hopital-fiche.php?id_struct=711>,
where he has been held since. His other lawyer, who previously commended
Fourtillan for the efficiency of his hormonal patches, was not reachable
today.