Norway: Risk of Dying From AstraZeneca Higher Than of COVID-19 / Norvège : Le risque de mourir d’AstraZeneca est plus élevé que celui de COVID-19 / Norwegen: Sterberisiko durch AstraZeneca höher als durch COVID-19
Norway: Risk of Dying From AstraZeneca Higher Than of COVID-19 Norvège : Le risque de mourir d’AstraZeneca est plus élevé que celui de COVID-19 Norwegen: Sterberisiko durch AstraZeneca höher als durch COVID-19
WARNING ABOUT THE DEEPL TRANSLATOR
Today I tried to translate a German headline on DeepL and it deliberately mistranslated it. Since it quite clearly knew that the proper translation of “Entvolkerung” is “depopulation”, I conclude that an algorithm has been made so that when the words “depopulation” and “vaccine” occur in the same sentence, “depopulation” is mistranslated as “development”. Of course I did try several times and in several ways and it refused to produce a correct translation.
AVERTISSEMENT CONCERNANT LE TRADUCTEUR DEEPL Aujourd’hui, j’ai essayé de traduire un titre allemand sur DeepL et il l’a délibérément mal traduit. Comme il savait très clairement que la traduction correcte de “Entvolkerung” est “dépeuplement”, j’en conclus qu’un algorithme a été créé pour que, lorsque les mots “dépeuplement” et “vaccin” apparaissent dans la même phrase, “dépeuplement” soit mal traduit par “développement”. Bien sûr, j’ai essayé plusieurs fois et de plusieurs façons, mais il a refusé de produire une traduction correcte. WARNUNG ÜBER DEN DEEPL-ÜBERSETZER Heute habe ich versucht, eine deutsche Schlagzeile auf DeepL zu übersetzen, und der Übersetzer hat sie absichtlich falsch übersetzt. Da er ganz klar wusste, dass die richtige Übersetzung von “Entvolkerung” “depopulation” ist, schließe ich daraus, dass ein Algorithmus erstellt wurde, so dass, wenn die Wörter “depopulation” und “vaccine” im selben Satz vorkommen, “depopulation” als “development” falsch übersetzt wird. Natürlich habe ich es mehrmals und auf verschiedene Arten versucht, und es hat sich geweigert, eine korrekte Übersetzung zu erstellen.
Norway: Risk of Dying From AstraZeneca Higher Than of COVID-19
While waiting for the final decision on the controversial vaccine, Norway has decided to distribute its stock of AstraZeneca to fellow Nordic countries that actually want to use them despite the associated risks.
Norwegians run a greater risk of dying from being inoculated with AstraZeneca’s vaccine than from COVID-19, the National Institute of Public Health (FHI) concluded in its analysis, recommending the vaccine, previously linked to serious complications in the form of rare blood clotting and haemorrhage amid low platelet counts.
Abstaining from the vaccine could possibly prevent up to 10 deaths related to side effects, the FHIsaid, according to the newspaperVerdens Gang.
So far, Norway has seen five cases of serious incidents reported shortly after vaccination, with three fatalities. FHI has calculated the mortality rate from the AstraZeneca vaccine as 2.3 people per 100,000 vaccinated.
The FHI stressed that continuing to inoculate will by contrast expose younger women to an “unreasonably high risk”, given the current relatively levels of infection in Norway.
Furthermore, the institute is against offering the vaccine on a voluntary basis, which has been proposed both in Norway and fellow Scandinavian nations.
“We believe that such an alternative may appear unethical and with a high risk that those who make such a choice have not fully understood the risk to which they are exposed,” the institute said.
The FHI also ventured that recommending the AstraZeneca vaccine for further use could lead tolower confidenceamong the population in vaccination programmes in general.
“This could lead to a lower vaccination rate and vaccination rate in the long run, and that patients in risk groups will also say no to vaccines.”
A recent survey by the FHI in collaboration with Mindshare and Norstat, indicated that 76 percent of the respondents were sceptical of at least one of the vaccines, even though 82 percent were initially positive about getting vaccinated. Of the vaccines, AstraZeneca gained the highest level of scepticism at 99 percent, compared with Moderna (9 percent) and Pfizer (8 percent). [OH, YAY! PERHAPS PEOPLE ARE NOT THAT BRAIN-DEAD AFTER ALL!]
However, the government believes it is too early to discontinue the vaccine completely, and is instead launching a new expert group to further investigate both AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, which triggered similar concerns.
Pending a final decision, however, Norway has decided to distribute its stock of AstraZeneca to fellow Nordic countries that actually want to use them.
Of the Norwegian stock, Sweden will borrow 200,000, while 16,000 will go to Iceland.
“If the use of the AstraZeneca vaccine is resumed, we will get back the doses we lend as soon as we request it. Sweden and Iceland will then send back the doses from their first deliveries from AstraZeneca,” Health Minister Bent Høiesaid, as quoted byVerdens Gang.
The agency’s Swedish equivalent, the Swedish Public Health Agency, has, however, made a completely different assessment and believes that the benefits of the vaccine far outweigh the risk of side effects.
State epidemiologist Anders Tegnell described the contentious vaccine as having a “high protective effect” and “reducing the risk of serious illness and death, especially among the elderly and weak”. [EXCUSE ME WHILE I CHOKE. STATS OUT OF GERMANY AND ISRAEL ARE SHOWING PEOPLE INJURED AND DYING IN DROVES AFTER TAKING THESE VACCINES SEE ARTICLES BELOW]
Earlier this spring, dozens of countries temporarily stopped the use of the AstraZeneca shot amid reports ofside effects. Of them, many, like Sweden, have since resumed inoculation, citing a precarious infection situation and shortages of other vaccines.